英語を「正しく理解し、正確に表現する」ことを何より大切だと考えております。
英文を分析するための英文法力、さらに発信のための英文の蓄積が重要です。このため、文法、発音、音読、暗誦に力を入れた指導を実践しています。
メールマガジン
ジャンル一覧
プロフィール
エブリ・イングリッシュ・サービス
■Category
塾・スクール
■PR
英語を「正しく理解し、正確に表現する」ことを何より大切だと考えております。 英文を分析するための英文法力、さらに発信のための英文の蓄積が重要です。このため、文法、発音、音読、暗誦に力を入れた指導を実践しています。
■URL
http://www.every-es.jp/
カレンダー
<< 2019 年 1 月 >>
| 日 | 月 | 火 | 水 | 木 | 金 | 土 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
最新の記事
戦争が家にやってきた��
独裁者、暴走す！��
英検１級２次対策��
英検１級２次対策��
英検１級２次対策��
英検1級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
独裁者、暴走す！��
英検１級２次対策��
英検１級２次対策��
英検１級２次対策��
英検1級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
英検２級２次対策��
最新コメント一覧
最新トラックバック一覧
お気に入り一覧
バックナンバー
2018-11 ( 1 )
2018-10 ( 23 )
2018-09 ( 29 )
2018-08 ( 53 )
2018-07 ( 75 )
2018-06 ( 43 )
2018-05 ( 40 )
2018-04 ( 34 )
2018-03 ( 1 )
2018-02 ( 1 )
2017-12 ( 1 )
2017-07 ( 1 )
2017-03 ( 8 )
2017-02 ( 12 )
2017-01 ( 7 )
2016-12 ( 17 )
2016-11 ( 16 )
2016-10 ( 17 )
2016-09 ( 5 )
2016-07 ( 6 )
2016-05 ( 13 )
2016-04 ( 5 )
2016-03 ( 33 )
2014-04 ( 6 )
2013-06 ( 2 )
2013-04 ( 7 )
2013-03 ( 13 )
2013-02 ( 11 )
2013-01 ( 7 )
2012-11 ( 1 )
2012-10 ( 11 )
2012-09 ( 9 )
2012-08 ( 9 )
2012-07 ( 7 )
2012-06 ( 17 )
2012-05 ( 26 )
2012-04 ( 31 )
2012-03 ( 27 )
2012-02 ( 32 )
2012-01 ( 29 )
2011-12 ( 23 )
2011-11 ( 27 )
2011-10 ( 21 )
2011-09 ( 36 )
2011-08 ( 11 )
2010-10 ( 2 )
2009-08 ( 1 )
2008-04 ( 1 )
2018-10 ( 23 )
2018-09 ( 29 )
2018-08 ( 53 )
2018-07 ( 75 )
2018-06 ( 43 )
2018-05 ( 40 )
2018-04 ( 34 )
2018-03 ( 1 )
2018-02 ( 1 )
2017-12 ( 1 )
2017-07 ( 1 )
2017-03 ( 8 )
2017-02 ( 12 )
2017-01 ( 7 )
2016-12 ( 17 )
2016-11 ( 16 )
2016-10 ( 17 )
2016-09 ( 5 )
2016-07 ( 6 )
2016-05 ( 13 )
2016-04 ( 5 )
2016-03 ( 33 )
2014-04 ( 6 )
2013-06 ( 2 )
2013-04 ( 7 )
2013-03 ( 13 )
2013-02 ( 11 )
2013-01 ( 7 )
2012-11 ( 1 )
2012-10 ( 11 )
2012-09 ( 9 )
2012-08 ( 9 )
2012-07 ( 7 )
2012-06 ( 17 )
2012-05 ( 26 )
2012-04 ( 31 )
2012-03 ( 27 )
2012-02 ( 32 )
2012-01 ( 29 )
2011-12 ( 23 )
2011-11 ( 27 )
2011-10 ( 21 )
2011-09 ( 36 )
2011-08 ( 11 )
2010-10 ( 2 )
2009-08 ( 1 )
2008-04 ( 1 )
最新のRSS
リンク一覧
・ コミュプラス トップ
・ アイエフネットポータル
・ Bizloopサーチ
・ Bizloopマッチング
・ アイエフネットポータル
・ Bizloopサーチ
・ Bizloopマッチング
携帯サイトはこちらから
英作文
World Heritage Sites are more advantageous than disadvantageous
I claim that World Heritage Sites have more disadvantages than advantages for the following reasons--environmental problems and irresponsible UNESCO.
First, since World Heritage Sites attract a lot of foreign travelers, sometimes these sites are often damaged.
With increasing number of visitors, areas surrounding the sites will have trouble caused by those who do not care and do not know much about environment.
For instance, Shirakami mountain district in Japan has suffering from spreading of exotic plants.
These plants were brought by tourists, in the form of seeds.
The local government does not know much about these plants and have no plan and budget to deal with these problems.
Second, UNESCO does not have much knowledge about the background of the site.
A beautiful valley in German was registered as a cultural heritage site.
As the number of visitors increased rapidly, the local government had a plan to build a bridge across the river to solve expected traffic jams.
However, UNESCO did not like the idea and suggested that the local referendum to think twice before construct a bridge.
It said, they should dig a tunnel instead.
Discussing with geologists, environmentalists, and constructors, the local government finally decided to build the designated bridge.
Then, the World Heritage Committee deleted the valley from the list.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that a World Heritage Site is not always advantageous for the nation.
(241words)
ある参加者の方のエッセイを参考に、加筆させていただいたものです。
こちらも、割とよく、関連問題集に登場する英作文のテーマです。
人類の直面する3つの問題
Three problems we will face in the future
There are three problems we will face in the future--food shortage, population bomb and the gaps between the rich and the poor.
First, let me talk about food shortage.
There is no sign that the decrease of human population.
We need more and more food to feed people, however, many of us have difficulties getting sufficient amount of food today, because of climate changes, global warming, and devastated environment.
We cannot meet the food demand even today.
Second, people live longer than ever with the development of medicine.
The problem is that older people need more help than the youth.
They become sick or injured more easily than youngsters and it takes longer to cure.
At the same time, in many cases they have chronicle diseases.
Also, in developing nations, more and more children are born.
Population bomb is ticking now.
Governments’ financial burdens will become heavier and heavier.
Finally, the gap between the rich and the poor is getting wider.
Some economists pointed out that 80% of human fortune all over the world is in the hand of 10 per cent of people.
A handful of rich people spend the money poor people earn in longer than 100 years.
I am afraid that the three problems we will face in the future are lack of food, too many people, and the widen gap between the haves and the have-nots.
(231words)
英検準1級に出題されそうなトピックです。
いままでに、他の級でも、似たようなエッセイが出題されています。
とりあえず、
Electronic dictionaries are more useful in studying than printed dictionaries.
というタイトルで書いてみました。
Electronic dictionaries are more useful in studying than printed dictionaries for the following three reasons.
First, electronic dictionaries are lighter to carry than printed dictionaries.
In Japan, pupils and students often carry heavy bags filled with heavy textbooks and dictionaries on the way to school--sometimes as heavy as ten kilograms or heavier.
These bags are too heavy for growing youngsters and have terrible influence on these growing kids.
Second, electronic dictionaries contain the contents of many printed dictionaries.
For instance, my dictionary has two English-Japanese, one Japanese-English, several English-English dictionaries and encyclopedia as well.
Suppose you carry these dictionaries in the printed versions, how heavy they will be.
I think it makes study easier and comfortable.
Finally, electronic dictionaries can make sounds. In studying English, leaning pronunciation is very important.
However, many of us do not have any model English speakers around us.
Most electronic dictionaries tell us how to pronounce words correctly.
As we have seen, electronic dictionaries have more advantages to students than printed ones in studying for the reasons mentioned above.
いままで、
�（犬了呂泙蝓⊆�分の立場を明確に示すこと。
�△い�つの理由を述べるか書くこと。
�Ｍ�由を、説明または具体例とともに詳しく述べること。
を見てきました。
最後は�し誅世任后�
よく In conclusion を使われる方がいます。
もちろん、間違いではないのですが、I conclude that ...のようが、よく使われるように思います。
また、結論部分で、新しい意見を述べてはいけません。
ときどき、結論の部分で、3つ目の理由を挙げる方もいます。
これもよくないです。
テーマ英作文の場合には、スリルやサスペンスは、入れる必要がありません。
すっきりと、�―�論（意見の全体図）�∨槝澄瞥�由の説明）�７誅澄憤娶�の全体図をもう一度）とまとめておくといいでしょう。
というわけで、
I conclude that the Japanese people waste too much water.
I think we should think more about people who cannot have enough drinkable water.
（日本人は水を無駄遣いしていると思います。
十分に飲料水がない人たちのことをもっと考えるべきだと思います」
というような形で、まとめていけばよいと思います。
そこで、もう一つの理由の説明に取り掛かります。
二つ目ですから、
Next, Then, Second, Secondly などで始めるとわかりやすいですね。
Second, we do not see the importance of having a lot of drinkable water.
「二つ目に、わたしたちは、たくさんの飲料水があることの大切さを分かっていません」
ここで具体例を出すことにします。
For instance, many people throw away water when they felt satisfied.
In zoos, amusement parks and any other places, we see children have plastic bottles in which there is clean water.
When they played around enjoying a lot of games and plays, they will go back.
I was shocked to see them throw away the plastic bottles in which there was some water.
They may think they had enough.
But I am afraid that we should know better than to throw away usable water.
「たとえば、多くの人が、飲み終えたら、水を捨ててしまいます。
動物園や遊園地では、子供たちがペットボトルの水を持っているのをよく見かけます。
遊びまわった後、彼らは家に帰ります。
ところがその時、ペットボトルに水が残っているのに、捨ててしまうのです。
もう十分飲んだからいい、と思っているのでしょう。
でも、飲める水を捨てるのをやめる分別を持つべきだと思います」
与えられた作文のテーマに対して、イエスかノーか、という立場を明らかにしました。
次に、いくつ理由があるかを述べます。
英検では、いくつ理由を述べなくてはならないか、書いてありますから、それを述べればよいです。
したがって、I have two reasons to support the idea. などを書いてください。
次に理由をひとつひとつ挙げていきます。
この時も、First, あるいは、Firstly, という具合に、どれが一つ目の理由、どれが二つ目の理由かわかるように書きます。
First, we use clean tap water to wash our cars or other things.
「まず、わたしたちは、きれいな水道水を、自動車をあらうのにつかいます」
そして、その説明をします。
In Japan, we have clean drinkable water from the tap.
We do not distinguish clean drinkable water from not so clean water.
We drink tap water and use the same tap water to clean machines and cars.
In many parts of the world, a lot of people do not have enough water to drink.
「日本では、水道からきれいな飲むことのできる水が出てきます。
わたしたちは、きれいな飲料水と、それほど清潔でない水とを区別しません。
水道水を飲み、同じ水道水で機械や自動車を洗います。
世界の多くの場所では、たくさんの人たちが、十分な飲料水を持っていません」
少し長くなりましたが、理由を出したらその説明をすることが大切です。
わたしたちは、自分たちが言わなくてもわかるよね、と思うことは省略してしまうことが多いのです。
でも、英語で書く場合には、こうしたことを少し詳しく説明する必要があります。
英検では、数年後のセンター試験への参入を念頭に置いてだと思いますが、各級において、テーマ英作文導入が進んでいます。
そこで案外知られていないのが、テーマ英作文の書き方です。
実際に、学生の方たちに書いていただくと、何となく奇妙な作文が増えてしまいます。
その理由は、基本的な書き方の指導を受けていないせいだと思います。
そこで、ここでは、やさしい2級程度の作文を通じて、テーマ英作文の書き方を学んでいきたいと思います。
２級あたりだと、質問は、Do you think the Japanese waste too much water? （日本人は水を無駄遣いしていると思いますか？)というパターンのものが多いです。
基本は、イエスかノーでこたえて、その後、理由を述べます。
このとき、Yes, I do. または No, I don't. ではシンプルすぎるので、次のように書く方が良いです。
Yes, I think the Japanese waste too much water. とか No, I don't think they use too much water. などです。
要は、タイトルを知らない人が見ても、これから何を書こうとしているのかがよくわかること。
つぎに理由です。
これも For example, ... といった具合に書き始める人がいるのですが、そうではなく、
I have two reasons why I think so. とか、There are two reasons why I do not agree with the idea.
こんな具合で、いくつの理由があるのかを説明していくとわかりやすいです。
そして、その具体的な理由に入るのです。
(この項、つづく）
I think that the Internet censorship is necessary for the following three reasons.
First, the internet censorship can prevent youngsters from accessing unsuitable websites, containing such as pornography, violent scenes, and so on.
It is impossible for ordinary citizens like us to examine the contents of websites, and judge whether they are good or not.
Censorship by experts is the only way to reduce the number of these terrible sites.
Second, the Internet provides criminals an ideal means of communication.
Under the cover of anonymity, they can exchange information about crime plans, such as robberies, murders and so on.
If the government introduces Internet censorship, these criminals may withdraw from the online world.
Finally, the Internet censorship can protect people from terrible traps.
Everyday through the Internet, we receive a lot of spam mail inviting us to join suspicious groups or engage in risky business. The Internet censorship by the police or experts can reduce these kinds of spam.
I believe that there are a lot of risks on the Internet and it should be censored carefully.
Then we can enjoy the Internet more.
これはあくまでも英検対策用の作文で、個人の意見や考えを反映したものではありません。
There are some cases we can justify wars--first, to protect our people, second, to protect our land and finally, to protect our fortune.
Let me explain.
First, each nation should protect its people.
When another country send its army to the land and begins to kill people, it should be accepted for the government to fight against the invaders.
Imagine when someone came into your house and try to kill your family members.
No law will prevent you from protecting yourself and your wife, children, and relatives.
Therefore, the war to protect your people should be justified.
Second, without land, we cannot sustain our lives.
When someone occupies your place and lock you out of your place, you can attack that person and regain your land.
This is the second case wars should be justified.
Finally, you have right to ask other nations for help in case that thieves take your money, treasure and other fortunes.
No one has good reason to take your fortune.
Justice is on your side.
To keep thieves away from your land, you can protect yourself with weapons and soldiers.
Self-protection should be justified.
As I mentioned above, there are wars which should be justified in case that someone tries to take your life, land and fortune.
There are two big strategies to protect ourselves from an epidemic of diseases--first, medical care, and second, education.
First, when we find out a new disease or the disease which we thought we destroyed began to spread many people, we have to send specialists and medicine to keep it within an area.
We need experts of the disease, special things which are required to cure the patients, and hospitals to keep victimized people.
We have to exchange and share the information.
World co-operation among nations is necessary to prevent an epidemic.
Second, in a larger sense, however, education is necessary.
Even though we send experts to cure the patients, people in the epidemic area do not have sufficient amount of knowledge, they misunderstand our efforts and bother us.
For instance, when people had an attack of fever, local people believed it was caused by some religious reason and made a raid upon hospitals.
As a result, patients with critical condition were taken away.
As I mentioned above, when we have an attack of an epidemic, we need medical care.
But in a larger sense, people should have some medical knowledge.
World Heritage Sites
World Heritage SiteWorld Heritage Sites are more advantageous than disadvantageous
I claim that World Heritage Sites have more disadvantages than advantages for the following reasons--environmental problems and irresponsible UNESCO.
First, since World Heritage Sites attract a lot of foreign travelers, sometimes these sites are often damaged.
With increasing number of visitors, areas surrounding the sites will have trouble caused by those who do not care and do not know much about environment.
For instance, Shirakami mountain district in Japan has suffering from spreading of exotic plants.
These plants were brought by tourists, in the form of seeds.
The local government does not know much about these plants and have no plan and budget to deal with these problems.
Second, UNESCO does not have much knowledge about the background of the site.
A beautiful valley in German was registered as a cultural heritage site.
As the number of visitors increased rapidly, the local government had a plan to build a bridge across the river to solve expected traffic jams.
However, UNESCO did not like the idea and suggested that the local referendum to think twice before construct a bridge.
It said, they should dig a tunnel instead.
Discussing with geologists, environmentalists, and constructors, the local government finally decided to build the designated bridge.
Then, the World Heritage Committee deleted the valley from the list.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that a World Heritage Site is not always advantageous for the nation.
(241words)
ある参加者の方のエッセイを参考に、加筆させていただいたものです。
Posted at 2018年09月22日 15時57分47秒 / コメント( 0 )
人類が将来直面する問題
人類が将来直面する問題こちらも、割とよく、関連問題集に登場する英作文のテーマです。
人類の直面する3つの問題
Three problems we will face in the future
There are three problems we will face in the future--food shortage, population bomb and the gaps between the rich and the poor.
First, let me talk about food shortage.
There is no sign that the decrease of human population.
We need more and more food to feed people, however, many of us have difficulties getting sufficient amount of food today, because of climate changes, global warming, and devastated environment.
We cannot meet the food demand even today.
Second, people live longer than ever with the development of medicine.
The problem is that older people need more help than the youth.
They become sick or injured more easily than youngsters and it takes longer to cure.
At the same time, in many cases they have chronicle diseases.
Also, in developing nations, more and more children are born.
Population bomb is ticking now.
Governments’ financial burdens will become heavier and heavier.
Finally, the gap between the rich and the poor is getting wider.
Some economists pointed out that 80% of human fortune all over the world is in the hand of 10 per cent of people.
A handful of rich people spend the money poor people earn in longer than 100 years.
I am afraid that the three problems we will face in the future are lack of food, too many people, and the widen gap between the haves and the have-nots.
(231words)
Posted at 2018年09月04日 11時08分20秒 / コメント( 0 )
紙の辞典か電子辞書か
紙の辞典か、電子辞書か英検準1級に出題されそうなトピックです。
いままでに、他の級でも、似たようなエッセイが出題されています。
とりあえず、
Electronic dictionaries are more useful in studying than printed dictionaries.
というタイトルで書いてみました。
Electronic dictionaries are more useful in studying than printed dictionaries for the following three reasons.
First, electronic dictionaries are lighter to carry than printed dictionaries.
In Japan, pupils and students often carry heavy bags filled with heavy textbooks and dictionaries on the way to school--sometimes as heavy as ten kilograms or heavier.
These bags are too heavy for growing youngsters and have terrible influence on these growing kids.
Second, electronic dictionaries contain the contents of many printed dictionaries.
For instance, my dictionary has two English-Japanese, one Japanese-English, several English-English dictionaries and encyclopedia as well.
Suppose you carry these dictionaries in the printed versions, how heavy they will be.
I think it makes study easier and comfortable.
Finally, electronic dictionaries can make sounds. In studying English, leaning pronunciation is very important.
However, many of us do not have any model English speakers around us.
Most electronic dictionaries tell us how to pronounce words correctly.
As we have seen, electronic dictionaries have more advantages to students than printed ones in studying for the reasons mentioned above.
Posted at 2018年09月04日 10時48分52秒 / コメント( 0 )
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��いままで、
�（犬了呂泙蝓⊆�分の立場を明確に示すこと。
�△い�つの理由を述べるか書くこと。
�Ｍ�由を、説明または具体例とともに詳しく述べること。
を見てきました。
最後は�し誅世任后�
よく In conclusion を使われる方がいます。
もちろん、間違いではないのですが、I conclude that ...のようが、よく使われるように思います。
また、結論部分で、新しい意見を述べてはいけません。
ときどき、結論の部分で、3つ目の理由を挙げる方もいます。
これもよくないです。
テーマ英作文の場合には、スリルやサスペンスは、入れる必要がありません。
すっきりと、�―�論（意見の全体図）�∨槝澄瞥�由の説明）�７誅澄憤娶�の全体図をもう一度）とまとめておくといいでしょう。
というわけで、
I conclude that the Japanese people waste too much water.
I think we should think more about people who cannot have enough drinkable water.
（日本人は水を無駄遣いしていると思います。
十分に飲料水がない人たちのことをもっと考えるべきだと思います」
というような形で、まとめていけばよいと思います。
Posted at 2018年08月11日 18時06分32秒 / コメント( 0 )
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��そこで、もう一つの理由の説明に取り掛かります。
二つ目ですから、
Next, Then, Second, Secondly などで始めるとわかりやすいですね。
Second, we do not see the importance of having a lot of drinkable water.
「二つ目に、わたしたちは、たくさんの飲料水があることの大切さを分かっていません」
ここで具体例を出すことにします。
For instance, many people throw away water when they felt satisfied.
In zoos, amusement parks and any other places, we see children have plastic bottles in which there is clean water.
When they played around enjoying a lot of games and plays, they will go back.
I was shocked to see them throw away the plastic bottles in which there was some water.
They may think they had enough.
But I am afraid that we should know better than to throw away usable water.
「たとえば、多くの人が、飲み終えたら、水を捨ててしまいます。
動物園や遊園地では、子供たちがペットボトルの水を持っているのをよく見かけます。
遊びまわった後、彼らは家に帰ります。
ところがその時、ペットボトルに水が残っているのに、捨ててしまうのです。
もう十分飲んだからいい、と思っているのでしょう。
でも、飲める水を捨てるのをやめる分別を持つべきだと思います」
Posted at 2018年08月10日 17時57分01秒 / コメント( 0 )
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��与えられた作文のテーマに対して、イエスかノーか、という立場を明らかにしました。
次に、いくつ理由があるかを述べます。
英検では、いくつ理由を述べなくてはならないか、書いてありますから、それを述べればよいです。
したがって、I have two reasons to support the idea. などを書いてください。
次に理由をひとつひとつ挙げていきます。
この時も、First, あるいは、Firstly, という具合に、どれが一つ目の理由、どれが二つ目の理由かわかるように書きます。
First, we use clean tap water to wash our cars or other things.
「まず、わたしたちは、きれいな水道水を、自動車をあらうのにつかいます」
そして、その説明をします。
In Japan, we have clean drinkable water from the tap.
We do not distinguish clean drinkable water from not so clean water.
We drink tap water and use the same tap water to clean machines and cars.
In many parts of the world, a lot of people do not have enough water to drink.
「日本では、水道からきれいな飲むことのできる水が出てきます。
わたしたちは、きれいな飲料水と、それほど清潔でない水とを区別しません。
水道水を飲み、同じ水道水で機械や自動車を洗います。
世界の多くの場所では、たくさんの人たちが、十分な飲料水を持っていません」
少し長くなりましたが、理由を出したらその説明をすることが大切です。
わたしたちは、自分たちが言わなくてもわかるよね、と思うことは省略してしまうことが多いのです。
でも、英語で書く場合には、こうしたことを少し詳しく説明する必要があります。
Posted at 2018年08月09日 17時44分05秒 / コメント( 0 )
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��
テーマ英作文への挑戦！��英検では、数年後のセンター試験への参入を念頭に置いてだと思いますが、各級において、テーマ英作文導入が進んでいます。
そこで案外知られていないのが、テーマ英作文の書き方です。
実際に、学生の方たちに書いていただくと、何となく奇妙な作文が増えてしまいます。
その理由は、基本的な書き方の指導を受けていないせいだと思います。
そこで、ここでは、やさしい2級程度の作文を通じて、テーマ英作文の書き方を学んでいきたいと思います。
２級あたりだと、質問は、Do you think the Japanese waste too much water? （日本人は水を無駄遣いしていると思いますか？)というパターンのものが多いです。
基本は、イエスかノーでこたえて、その後、理由を述べます。
このとき、Yes, I do. または No, I don't. ではシンプルすぎるので、次のように書く方が良いです。
Yes, I think the Japanese waste too much water. とか No, I don't think they use too much water. などです。
要は、タイトルを知らない人が見ても、これから何を書こうとしているのかがよくわかること。
つぎに理由です。
これも For example, ... といった具合に書き始める人がいるのですが、そうではなく、
I have two reasons why I think so. とか、There are two reasons why I do not agree with the idea.
こんな具合で、いくつの理由があるのかを説明していくとわかりやすいです。
そして、その具体的な理由に入るのです。
(この項、つづく）
Posted at 2018年08月08日 17時43分52秒 / コメント( 0 )
インターネットに検閲は必要か？��
Agree or Disagree; the Internet Should Be CensoredI think that the Internet censorship is necessary for the following three reasons.
First, the internet censorship can prevent youngsters from accessing unsuitable websites, containing such as pornography, violent scenes, and so on.
It is impossible for ordinary citizens like us to examine the contents of websites, and judge whether they are good or not.
Censorship by experts is the only way to reduce the number of these terrible sites.
Second, the Internet provides criminals an ideal means of communication.
Under the cover of anonymity, they can exchange information about crime plans, such as robberies, murders and so on.
If the government introduces Internet censorship, these criminals may withdraw from the online world.
Finally, the Internet censorship can protect people from terrible traps.
Everyday through the Internet, we receive a lot of spam mail inviting us to join suspicious groups or engage in risky business. The Internet censorship by the police or experts can reduce these kinds of spam.
I believe that there are a lot of risks on the Internet and it should be censored carefully.
Then we can enjoy the Internet more.
これはあくまでも英検対策用の作文で、個人の意見や考えを反映したものではありません。
Posted at 2018年07月30日 11時32分12秒 / コメント( 0 )
Are wars ever justified?
Are wars ever justified?There are some cases we can justify wars--first, to protect our people, second, to protect our land and finally, to protect our fortune.
Let me explain.
First, each nation should protect its people.
When another country send its army to the land and begins to kill people, it should be accepted for the government to fight against the invaders.
Imagine when someone came into your house and try to kill your family members.
No law will prevent you from protecting yourself and your wife, children, and relatives.
Therefore, the war to protect your people should be justified.
Second, without land, we cannot sustain our lives.
When someone occupies your place and lock you out of your place, you can attack that person and regain your land.
This is the second case wars should be justified.
Finally, you have right to ask other nations for help in case that thieves take your money, treasure and other fortunes.
No one has good reason to take your fortune.
Justice is on your side.
To keep thieves away from your land, you can protect yourself with weapons and soldiers.
Self-protection should be justified.
As I mentioned above, there are wars which should be justified in case that someone tries to take your life, land and fortune.
Posted at 2018年07月26日 10時37分21秒 / コメント( 0 )
How should we prevent an epidemic?
How should we prevent an epidemic?There are two big strategies to protect ourselves from an epidemic of diseases--first, medical care, and second, education.
First, when we find out a new disease or the disease which we thought we destroyed began to spread many people, we have to send specialists and medicine to keep it within an area.
We need experts of the disease, special things which are required to cure the patients, and hospitals to keep victimized people.
We have to exchange and share the information.
World co-operation among nations is necessary to prevent an epidemic.
Second, in a larger sense, however, education is necessary.
Even though we send experts to cure the patients, people in the epidemic area do not have sufficient amount of knowledge, they misunderstand our efforts and bother us.
For instance, when people had an attack of fever, local people believed it was caused by some religious reason and made a raid upon hospitals.
As a result, patients with critical condition were taken away.
As I mentioned above, when we have an attack of an epidemic, we need medical care.
But in a larger sense, people should have some medical knowledge.
Posted at 2018年07月24日 10時36分35秒 / コメント( 0 )
